Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 switching from Tizen to WearOS would be a disaster — here’s why
Samsung Galaxy Lookout 4 switching from Tizen to WearOS would be a disaster — hither'due south why
With all due respect to my colleague Kate, who argues that Samsung switching from Tizen to Wear OS for its Galaxy Watch 4 would be a game-changer, I'm here to tell you that such a move would be a disaster and ruin all that's special about Samsung smartwatches.
First, let's take a look at market share. According to Canalsys, in the first half of 2020, Samsung'due south smartwatches accounted for roughly 12 percent of the unabridged smartwatch marketplace. It came in third to Apple (36%) and Huawei (fourteen%), the latter spurred by sales in China. All others — which includes all Article of clothing OS watches — made up a combined 22% of the market, backside both Garmin and Fitbit.
- Best smartwatches
- Smartwatch buying guide: Everything you demand to know
From just a market perspective, Samsung abandoning Tizen for a platform that is an also-ran makes fiddling sense. But allow's also await at it from the bespeak of view of a prospective smartwatch owner.
When you look at Apple Watches and Wear Os watches, they have one thing in common: lousy battery life. Even nether the best of circumstances, you'll be lucky to get two full days without needing to recharge your battery. Tizen's more efficient operating organization, on the other hand, lets yous use a Samsung smart watch for at to the lowest degree three days. That's not spectacular when compared to the likes of Garmin and Fitbit, but at least you can get on a weekend trip and not worry that your watch will die by the time you get dorsum.
Adjacent, let's look at the hardware. Right now, if y'all want to use Wear Os, yous're pretty much locked in to using a specific Qualcomm Snapdragon 4100 processor, which was announced last June. Information technology was the get-go major update in ii years, and even now, there's less than a scattering of watches running the latest chip.
How bad is it? When I did a Google search for "WearOS," the first two questions in the People Also Ask box were "Is Wearos expert" and "Is WearOS expressionless?"
Pretty much the only major company using WearOS is the Fossil Group, which sells smartwatches under one-half a dozen brands — Misfit, Skagen, Armani Exchange, Diesel fuel, Emporio Armani, and Michael Kors. All of those smartwatches are powered by the Qualcomm 3100 bit, which came out in 2018.
I can see why Fossil chose WearOS, and why information technology's tempting for Samsung; information technology'southward much easier and cheaper to create a myriad of cases when you lot tin can standardize the internal components. It'southward like ownership a Toyota Camry, just being able to select from dozens of trim packages.
I as well get that, because WearOS has the weight of Google backside it, more developers have are likely to develop apps for the platform. Plus, yous can link it with all of Google'due south apps, as well as Google Assistant.
Just, because of this standardization, you don't meet any innovation within WearOS; slap a bejeweled bezel on a watch, toll information technology at $350, and call it a day.
In the past year or and then, Apple, Fitbit, Garmin, and Samsung have all brought out a myriad of new wellness and fitness-tracking features such as SP02 tracking, claret oxygen monitoring, skin temperature sensors, and more than. Meanwhile, on WearOS devices, yous get ... a center charge per unit monitor, a characteristic y'all tin find on $25 fettle trackers.
Like the WearOS processors, it took 2 years — from 2018 to late 2020 — for Google to come with any meaningful update to WearOS. While Google did acquire Fitbit, the deal only concluded last calendar month, so its doubtful nosotros'd encounter any integration for a while. Let's simply hope that Google won't do to Fitbit what Fitbit did to Pebble.
For me, though, information technology all comes back to battery life. The greater endurance of the Samsung Galaxy Watch over WearOS smartwatches is a real competitive advantage, as is the integration with its smartphones. And, as the second-largest smartphone maker in the world, having that tight compatibility helps.
Information technology's been pretty articulate that Google doesn't give the time of day to its smartwatch WearOS. Neither should Samsung.
Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/samsung-galaxy-watch-4-switching-from-tizen-to-wearos-would-be-a-disaster-heres-why
Posted by: tolmanwruch2000.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 switching from Tizen to WearOS would be a disaster — here’s why"
Post a Comment